I'm Arik.




Reach me:

What's here:

RSS of blog entries
Clips
Video
Links
LinkedIn Profile
The Hacking Project
Through the Keyboard archives
Old arik.org
J97 list
Maggie



My Latest Work

BusinessWeek Online
My stories RSS

Byte of the Apple
Column
Blog


My Regular Readings

BusinessWeek
Slashdot
Gothamist
The Inquirer
Macslash
MacMinute
Romenesko
Cyberjournalist.net
CJR
OJR
Salon Tech
Gizmodo
Engadget
Gawker
Wonkette
NYC24
Talking Biz News
The Funnies


Listen

Sirius
WBGO
Jonathan Schwartz
KCRW
Pairie Home Companion
The Writer's Almanac
Morning Edition
All Things Considered
On The Media

People
Dan Ackman
Chris Allbritton
Renee Blodgett
Shira Boss
Joe Burrascano
David Churbuck
Davide
Jon Dube
Dan Eisler
Chad Fasca
Jennifer Granick
Shel Israel
Barry Lank
Dave Lawrence
Andrew Lih
Ed Lin
Om Malik
David Mark
John McGrath
Adam Penenberg
Chris Phillips
Eric Prideaux
Jim Rosenberg
Michael Scully
Chris Shipley
Neal Skorpen
Sree Sreenivasan
Strongbad
Chris Taylor
Daniel Terdiman
Andrew West


Stuff I like


Archives

06.16.2002   06.23.2002   06.29.2003   10.12.2003   11.30.2003   12.07.2003   12.14.2003   12.21.2003   01.11.2004   01.18.2004   01.25.2004   02.01.2004   02.22.2004   03.07.2004   03.28.2004   04.11.2004   05.02.2004   05.16.2004   05.23.2004   09.26.2004   10.24.2004   10.31.2004   11.07.2004   11.14.2004   11.21.2004   12.26.2004   01.30.2005   02.06.2005   02.13.2005   02.20.2005   03.20.2005   03.27.2005   04.17.2005   05.08.2005   06.26.2005   07.03.2005   07.17.2005   09.04.2005   10.23.2005   10.30.2005   11.27.2005   12.04.2005   12.11.2005   12.18.2005   01.01.2006   02.05.2006   02.12.2006   02.26.2006   03.26.2006   06.04.2006   07.30.2006   09.03.2006   09.10.2006   11.05.2006   01.28.2007   07.15.2007   08.19.2007   08.26.2007   12.16.2007   12.23.2007   01.13.2008   03.30.2008   04.13.2008   05.04.2008   06.08.2008  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Get Thunderbird

Get Firefox







So you've found me.













So Gerry, how do you live there? 

 30 October 2005

"It's a nice place to visit but I wouldn't want to live there."

"How can you live there?"

The two statements above are variants of something that has really come to irritate me in the nine years I've lived in New York. People from elsewhere, primarily mid-sized cities on the West Coast reveal themselves to be jealous idiots by dissing the the most important, lively, and safest place in the world.

The latest case is someone hailing from my own home state. Gerry Frank is an octagenarian gadabout who lives in Salem, Oregon, chairman of the Oregon Tourism Commission, who is best known for his travel guide "Where to find it, buy it, eat it in New York."

Profiled earlier this week in the Metro section of The New York Times, he lets fly with the most typical of back-handed insults against the place he claims to love. In the third graf he proudly admits to thinking that "New York City 'is a great place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there,' adding, 'I love Oregon.'"

Funny how that works out, Gerry. We don't want you.

What bothers me most about people who visit New York, praise it as a tourist destination, and then slam it as a place to live, is that in my experience people feel allowed to say this about New York and nowhere else.

This is a strange social rule. People can insult New York by saying "I could never live there," but if a New Yorker were to say the same thing about some outback town in a fly-over state, they'd be panned as an elitist prig.

I grew up in Oregon, and I know enough about Salem to call it was it is: A place that revels in its own irrelevance. Nowhere else can you find a population so arrogant, yet having so little to be arrogant about.

Apparently Frank's tenure on the tourism commission hasn't done much. Personally I never hear of anyone visiting Oregon for any reason, personal or business. And the numbers bear this out. The commission reported last year that tourism grossed the Oregon economy $6.9 billion. Compare that to neighboring Washington State, which brought in $11.6 billion in direct travel spending. Apparently Oregon is neither a nice place to live, nor does anyone visit.

That dig about "I couldn't live there" contains a few layers of meaning. One is about the perceptions of safety in New York. But let's look at Salem. In 2003, violent crime in Salem was more than twice what it was in 1985. That makes for a crime rate of 360 per 100,000, versus 250 in 1985. In 2003, Oregon had the fourth-highest rate of propertly crime in the nation.

For the same period, safety in New York improved, and not just a little, but substantially. In 1985, out of every 100,000 people, 1,881 were the victims of violent crime. By 2003, that number had fallen more than twofold to 734. Still higher than in Salem, but improving constantly. Meanwhile Franks' utopia of Salem seems to be more crime-ridden by the day. Given its c current rate of increase, and the persistent rate of New York's decrease, Salem's crime rate per 100,000 citizens will be on par or slightly higher than that of New York by the end of this decade -- and that says nothing good about a city of less than 150,000 inhabitants.

These backhanded insults are silently yet inexplicably tolerated when said about New York, but of nowhere else. New Yorkers abhor the senitment greatly -- the Times reporter knew to ask Frank about it. If you're not a New Yorker, you should never say anything like "I couldn't live there," because it makes you look stupid. And these comments are rooted in simple failings of human emotion: Raging jealousy and envy, and no small part of ignorance. More often than not, people dismiss what they can't have in order to disguise the fact that they wish they could have it. By saying he "couldn't" live here Frank is revealing a great deal about his emotional state on the subject. Change the word "couldn't" to "can't" as in "unable," or more precisely "circumstances beyond one's control."

He doesn't live here for some unknown reason. Yet the in the Times article, he says he visits the city for one week every month, or more than a quarter of each year. (Is this even appropriate for someone who actually has a job promoting tourism somewhere else?) It may be financial -- maybe he has a really bad book agent -- or something else. Maybe he's afraid that he doesn't have what it takes (or at his age, never had it) to "make it here" and thus prove, as Sinatra so famously sang, that he could make it anywhere.

Meanwhile, look at who does live here. Pick a musician, performer, writer, composer, producer, politician, philantrophist, philosopher, poet, painter, sculptor, financier, entrepreneur, or pretty much anyone you've ever heard of. Chances are they live here, lived here, are planning to live here, or wish they did.

The only person I've ever heard of hailing from Salem is Gerry Frank, and that's only because he's riding on the coattails of a city which by his own admission is one in which he wouldn't live.

The next time someone ever says to me any variation of "How can you live there?" referring to New York City, I'm going to turn the question right around to them, and ask them how they can live where they do. When I travel, I see how other people live. After nine years of living in the best city in the world, I can't imagine living anywhere else, and find other places intolerable, inhospitable, and unsafe.

Maybe I could use a few connections, get an invitation to dinner at Gerry Frank's house in Salem, and on my way out the door, tell him "It's a nice house, but I don't think I could live here." How socially tactful is that?

The same rules of propriety should apply to people visiting New York. Don't come here if you're going to insult it. Show your respect, and remember that the reason it exists has nothing to do with you, but rather because of people who could choose to live anywhere else in the world, not only "can" live here, but do. When you say you "couldn't live there" you reveal yourself as one of those lesser beings, who indeed "can't" live here for reasons that are beyond your control.